> 
> 
> > 
> > What is your brother's super-hero name?
> > 
> > I need to know for my Hammer Boys write-up.  If he doesn't have one
> > already, you are authorized to make one up.
> >
> > - 1/2
> >
> 
> his superhero name is: "the boys from engineering"
>
> s
>

You are no longer authorized.  You have no idea what it takes to come
up with a super-hero name.  This was already evident and it is even
more so now.

Never mind the rule that a true super-hero name should somehow
describe the nature of that hero.  You have more than shown you can't
grasp that basic rule.  And now you want to go and defy the rules even
further by assigning a clearly plural assignation to a clearly
singular person.  This is just not done in the realm of super heroes
that I (and the rest of the civilized planet) am aware of or am ready
to accept.

I don't even want to start to mention all of the "minor" rules that
your proposed designation violates as well.  But I will, because I
know it will annoy you.

"Engineerinig" is a far too generic term.  The kids these days will be
expecting him to be a team of people driving a train.  Trust me. 
Until the kids get to the age where they begin to figure out Dilbert,
they still equate "Engineer" with "the guy who drives the train".

It's not like I'm making up these rules, they have always been
enforced if not expressly written down.  I'd think that a dense person
like yourself would be smart enough to have someone to point these
things out to you.  I guess you are lucky to have me.

Your brother's "working title" in my document so far has been
"Winchester".  This will not do, but it is way ahead of "the boys in
engineering" - which didn't even try to be properly capitalized.

An alternatate working title candidate I had in mind was "The Don". 
But I thought I should go with something that identified his nature as
something that opposed your nature.  And since your nature is only
improperly defined as "Mandor", I could only come up with "DogRof". 
And that wont do either.

- 1/2